Showing posts with label Sales and Marketing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sales and Marketing. Show all posts

Friday, August 9, 2013

Report: Specialized supermarkets take lead in industry - HEB, Wegman and more


There’s no denying that to many Americans, supermarkets are a bland and boring necessity. Sure, they’re convenient. But the way they’ve been bleeding market share for so long to other channels -- including drug, dollar, convenience, club, limited-assortment, discount and specialty stores, not to mention online retailers -- shows they just don’t generate loyalty.

A beefy new report from Hartman Strategy, a division of the Bellevue, Wash.-based Hartman Group, delves into how some supermarkets are becoming super again, while most are becoming increasingly irrelevant.
The best strategy, James F. Richardson, SVP of Hartman Strategy, which focuses solely on the food and beverage sector, tells Marketing Daily, is that supermarkets need to “focus on delivering great fresh food, which is driving the majority of shopping trips.”

Too many chains, he explains, act as if consumers are driven by the same pantry-stocking behaviors they were a decade ago. Hartman reports only 31% of dinners typically involve cooking from scratch. Instead, shoppers come to supermarkets to fuel their “what’s for dinner tonight?’ needs: Almost 31% of immediate-consumption eating occasions involved an item purchased at a grocery store.

And those so-called center-aisle products, the shelf-stable items that still account for 70% of sales, are less important. Sales are shrinking, not growing, and those slow-to-turn-over bottles of Worcester sauce, jars of pickles, and boxes of confectioners sugar cut into profits.

These consumer changes present plenty of risks for branded products as well. “The reality is that shifting volume out of grocery into discount channels presents a real long-term danger for established CPG suppliers,” the report says, “especially when discount channels are innovating in private-label emulations (and don’t require brand promotional spending to grab share).”

It’s also time for stores to abandon the pretense that they are all things for all people, he says. The fastest-growing leaders are those that are either offering specialization in a purely upmarket option, such as Whole Foods; one that is entirely downscale, like Winco; or an approach that varies its up-or-down strategy on a store-by-store play, a strategy used by HEB. 

Also critical: Making sure each store reflects local food culture. Tesco’s failure with Fresh & Easy provides a cautionary tale. 

“They ultimately designed an upmarket private label-heavy format that competes directly with Trader Joe’s,” the report notes, but then “placed 40% of its stores in zip codes skewing low income and/or low education, and 30% of its stores in Hispanic-heavy neighborhoods. The low-income, low-education consumer audience was not interested in their offering.”

By contrast, it points out how well Wegman localizes its stores, providing a high-end and differentiated experience to a broader audience.


Overall, the report says, it's time for stores to ditch the middle class. “The middle class consumer is more trained than ever to trade up or to trade down where appropriate in a multichannel food shopping context. They prefer to do this, however, at specialist retailers, whose commitment to editing the store against either of the market extremes is obvious, thorough, and well regarded in their social networks. Each supermarket ultimately needs to position itself at either extreme to outflank the local competition.”

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Oscar Meyer crafts the fanciest velvet bacon box ever for Father's Day

Oscar Meyer crafts the fanciest bacon box ever for Father's Day 


The folks at Oscar Mayer are allowing consumers to ‘say it with bacon’ as they can purchase velvet boxes full of bacon. The gifts are apparently available for just four weeks beginning June 4, 2013.

According to the WSJ:
"Delicately bundled in a luxurious velvet jewelers box, the Oscar Mayer Original Collection includes 18-20 slices of delicious Oscar Mayer Original bacon, and is available in three personalized gift sets: The Commander, which comes with a stainless steel money-clip engraved with the words “Bringin’ it Home” and an image of a bacon strip; The Matador, which features two handsome bacon strip cufflinks; and The Woodsman, which includes a rugged 12 function multitool with a bacon strip image carved into the handle."

You can purchase the boxes for around $22-28 each, only at www.SayItWithBacon.com from June 4 to July 1, 2013. Also, the video is hilarious…



Friday, April 26, 2013

Involving all aspects of supply chain in S and OP can lower inventory carrying costs

The "S" in S and OP Can Stand for Supply Chain, Too

Involving all aspects of supply chain in S and OP can lower inventory carrying costs.
Given that S&OP can affect demand forecasts, inventory levels, raw material purchase projections, production plans and forecasted labor utilization, it is worth considering whether the involvement of all supply chain-related functions in S&OP could have a positive effect on supply chain performance. APQC compared the cost of supply and demand planning and the inventory carrying cost of organizations that involve each of these groups in S&OP to the costs of organizations that do not involve the groups.

Demand and Supply Planning Costs

Table 1 presents the median performance of organizations with regard to demand and supply planning costs per $1,000 in revenue. Organizations that involve the logistics function and the manufacturing function in the S&OP process spend slightly less at the median on demand and supply planning per $1,000 in revenue than organizations that do not involve each of these functions. However, organizations that involve the purchasing function in S&OP spend $0.72 more per $1,000 in revenue on demand and supply planning than organizations that do not. For an organization with $5 billion in annual revenue, this would result in $3.6 million in additional demand and supply planning costs associated with involving the purchasing function in the S&OP process.


Table 2 presents organizations’ median inventory carrying cost as a percentage of average inventory value. Organizations that involve each of the supply chain functions spend much less to store and maintain inventory than organizations that do not involve each of these functions. The difference is largest when considering the involvement of the logistics function: the median inventory carrying cost for organizations that involve the logistics function in the S&OP process is almost half as much as that of organizations that do not involve this function. Organizations that involve the purchasing function have a 1% lower inventory carrying cost than organizations that do not involve this function. Although this difference may not seem large, for an organization with $1 billion in average inventory value, a 1% difference would translate into $10 million in additional inventory carrying cost.

The difference in performance illustrated in Table 2 indicates that involving the supply chain functions in S&OP can have a significant effect on the ability of an organization to plan for demand and thus to maintain an optimum amount of inventory. Keeping these functions involved in discussions regarding demand and production plans can enable the organization to optimize planning, purchasing and manufacturing to reduce the amount of inventory that must be stored.

Weigh the Effects

APQC’s data show that involving the supply chain functions (purchasing, logistics and manufacturing) in the S&OP process is associated with a lower inventory carrying cost and lower cost to conduct demand and supply planning. The exception to this is with organizations that involve the purchasing function, which incur higher costs for demand and supply planning than organizations that do not involve this function. However, the lower inventory carrying cost obtained by this group of organizations may help offset any additional costs generated in the demand and supply planning process.

Because S&OP affects the entire supply chain, organizations should give serious thought to involving representatives from the supply chain functions in this process. Organizations should consider whether any additional costs incurred in the planning process would be offset by increased efficiency or costs savings generated within the procurement, manufacturing, or logistics functions. It may be that involving the supply chain in S&OP is worth the investment.

Becky Partida is a research specialist, supply chain management, with APQC, a member-based nonprofit and one of the leading proponents of benchmarking and best practice business research.