Showing posts with label FCPG. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FCPG. Show all posts

Monday, October 21, 2013

Analysts expect more M&A from Kroger

Kroger could be in the market for more supermarket chains


Harris Teeter acquisition may be first of more in effort to grow, but Kroger will be cautious


Cincinnati-based Kroger is about to close on a $2.5 billion purchase of upscale Harris Teeter, and is always on the lookout for the next great deal.

Could Dominick’smarkets in Chicago be Kroger’s next purchase? A&P on the East Coast? Or a solid regional performer like Weis Markets in Pennsylvania?

In the past year, Kroger executives have indicated a new willingness to grow faster – including through acquisition. And the timing could be right: More than $10 billion worth of deals have been announced this year in the supermarket industry – the biggest wave of consolidation since 2006.

Still, many analysts urge caution.

• Interactive: Where Kroger might grow

Although more deals are likely for Kroger, the nation’s largest supermarket chain is notoriously picky about what it buys. Generally, Kroger prefers to acquire healthy operations, not struggling stores that currently dominate the prospective list of takeover rivals.

The steps Kroger takes with future acquisitions could determine how fast the company gets bigger and whether that means better. More stores and more sales could mean more profits and a higher stock price, unless Kroger acquires a dud that could drain resources and drag profits down.

Company executives don’t want a slowdown now. Shares hit an all-time high last week at $42.22, up more than 25 percent since the start of the year.

“I don’t see Kroger running out right away to make another major acquisition while still digesting and integrating Harris Teeter,” said Carol Levenson, an analyst with Gimmie Credit. “But you never know.”

Acquisition can be easier way to enter new markets
Analysts say grocery-chain mergers are accelerating due to a combination of low interest rates on loans and a gradual economic recovery. Because the industry grows slowly and is very competitive, strong operators consider buying weaker ones as one of the fastest and cheapest ways to grow.

Kroger – one of the strongest financial operators – has virtual first-refusal rights on any store or chain up for sale, analysts say. The company’s all-cash offer beat out 18 rival suitors for Harris Teeter, the highly regarded chain of 212 stores known for its loyal customers and copious food samplings.

Executives with the North Carolina chain even rejected a slightly higher offer because they doubted the other bidder could deliver the stated value.

“Kroger has built itself up and is doing very well,” said Andy Wolf, an analyst with BB&T Capital Markets.

The Harris Teeter takeover comes a year after Kroger boldly announced it was stepping up its growth targets. Last October, the company said it would ramp up capital spending by $200 million each year. The company also said it would invest in a targeted expansion strategy “in existing markets and enter new markets.”

“Kroger typically expands in new territories through acquisitions,” Kantar Retail analyst Alida Destrempe wrote in a September report.

The Harris Teeter deal delivers on Kroger’s expansion goals by strengthening its presence in five Southeastern states and giving it a foothold in three new ones as well as the District of Columbia. Even after the deal closes late this year, Kroger still has more territory to fill: It has no presence in 16 states, mostly in the upper Midwest and the Northeast.

Analysts note that, besides Harris Teeter, Kroger hasn’t made a large acquisition since 1999, when it merged with the Fred Meyer chain in a $13 billion deal. Instead Kroger has scooped up handfuls of stores over the past decade in a series of smaller deals. Many see Kroger sticking to that playbook.

Kroger officials declined to comment for this story.

Struggling companies come with disadvantages
Potential deals abound in regions where Kroger might like to expand: Safeway announced last month it will exit the Chicago market where it operates the Dominick’schain. The New Jersey-based Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. reportedly is shopping itself around. And Pennsylvania-based Weis Markets Inc. is in the midst of a management restructuring.

Analysts, though, believe Kroger will remain choosy. The turmoil within a company, division or market that often spurs the sale of a store or chain of stores could be what turns Kroger off.

“Kroger may not want a fixer-upper,” said Charles Pinson-Rose, an analyst with Standard & Poor’s. “They like good assets that add something to their operations.”

The Chicago market could be very appealing for Kroger, which strives to be the No. 1 or No. 2 player in every market in which it competes. Chicago is a major market where Kroger is a bit player with just 16 of its Food 4 Less stores.

“I wouldn’t rule it out. Kroger obviously wants to be in Chicago; it’s an opportunity to expand,” Morningstar analyst Ken Perkins said. “If anybody were to buy a lot of Dominick’s, it would be Kroger.”

Wolf noted, though, that Dominick’s is damaged goods: The No. 2 Chicago grocer (after Jewel-Osco) is in danger of slipping to No. 3 or 4. Kroger might be interested in buying some of the 72 stores for sale, but trying to turn around performance in a lot of them could prove an expensive distraction.

Perkins agreed that Kroger would need a big enough opportunity at a good price to justify buying a significant number ofDominick’s stores.

Ditto for Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. with 320 stores from Maryland to Connecticut. The grocer has struggled and downsized for years and just emerged from bankruptcy in 2012. News reports say the whole A&P chain might be available for between $500 million to $1 billion.

“There’s a reason these assets are for sale,” Telsey Advisory Group analyst Joseph Feldman said.

Financial data provides clues to other, healthier potential acquisition targets.

Stock in Weis Markets trades at about $50 per share, cheap when measured by its price to earnings ratio. The company operates 165 stores in Pennsylvania, Maryland, New Jersey, New York and West Virginia.

While Weis Markets sales dropped 1.9 percent last year, its financial results are relatively strong, showing consistent profits for more than a decade. Nonetheless, its chief executive, David Hepfinger, abruptly left the company last month to “pursue other interests” and Jonathan Weis, 45, grandson of the founder, was named interim CEO.

Weis officials declined to say whether Weis will remain in charge or whether a permanent CEO is being sought.

Weis Markets keeps a fairly low profile in the industry, but analysts say family-controlled companies become more likely to sell out to a larger player when a third generation of family assumes control. Company chairman Robert Weis, the 93-year-old son of co-founder Harry Weis, owns almost 47 percent of the company.

Feldman said companies with families owning large stakes could make a deal very easy or shut it down, depending on their wishes. He declined to speculate what the Weis family might do with their company.

Another potentially undervalued chain operating in untapped or underpenetrated markets for Kroger would be Milwaukee-based Roundy’s, which operates 160 stores in Wisconsin, Minnesota and Illinois. Last year, Roundy’s booked a $69.3 million loss amid tougher competition after years of consistent profits. With a stock trading below $8 the entire company theoretically could be purchased for less than $350 million.

Back in Chicago, Wolf noted Kroger might be holding out for a far bigger prize: Jewel-Osco, the region’s No. 1 player with 176 stores. The chain was acquired by an investment group led by private equity outfit Cerberus Capital Management.

Jewel-Osco is part of the troubled Albertson’s empire that was sold off by Supervalu for $3.3 billion in March. Wolf believes Cerberus will fix up various Albertson’s divisions in the next few years, then sell them off. 

Written by: 
Alexander Coolidge


Category Management Training: What Drives “Value” in Training?


“Value” has many definitions and interpretations – the Merriam Webster and Oxford dictionaries give eight!  It’s no surprise then that when asked to articulate the value of something in business, the results can vary dramatically.  The concept of “value” has been a hot topic in the industry as it relates to consumer-perceived value, and for us lately here at Category Management Knowledge Group, as it relates to evaluating the value of training for Category Management.  I’ve been asked many times in my career to articulate value:
  • The consumer perceived value of a premium product;
  • The value my category management team brought to the organization; or
  • The value a new technology or data source would deliver.
What remains consistent across any of these scenarios, and training, is the idea that value is derived as a relationship between cost and benefit, and cannot simply be defined as price.
Value = Benefits / Costs
Value ≠ Price
Cost is usually pretty straight-forward to define, and should include any upfront or ongoing monetary costs, as well as the investment of time or other resources.  Benefits however, can be much more subjective.  Benefits are often perceived, and can’t always be quantified.  It is critical though to identify the benefits that you require and expect, before you can attempt to assign or evaluate “Value”.  Let’s illustrate this idea for “the value of category management training”, using a simple 3 step evaluation process:
  1. Identify Training Objectives (intended benefits)
  2. Determine Features Required to Achieve Objectives
  3. Complete Cost-Benefit Analysis
1.  Identify Training Objectives (Intended Benefits):
The most common objectives for category management training should be:
 Category Management Training
These are pretty lofty objectives, but they are also the reality of the requirements in today’s business environment.  Companies are being asked to ‘do more with less’, are investing thousands or millions of dollars in data and technologies, and expect results!  Many of these objectives can only be measured over time, and so carefully evaluating the features of your potential training solution for the role they can play achieving these long-term objectives is also critical.
2.  Determine Features Required to Achieve Objectives:
Here’s my assessment of critical features, and how they relate to achieving these long term benefits:

Certified Category Management TrainingAccredited online training content
  • Drives consistency across teams and organizations by ensuring the same content is available to everyone;
  • Drives sustainability over time; and
  • Accreditation ensures industry standard content is being delivered.
Category Management SupportSupport and coaching system
  • Ensures focus on ‘building capability’, not just ‘completing training’; and
  • Having a support and coaching team that is grounded in category management ensures that students receive the support they need throughout their training program. 
Category Management ResourcesCurrent and leading edge resources
  • Ensures that your training and resources are current; data and technology are evolving faster than ever before (80% of world’s data today was generated in the last 24 months!).
Category Management ReportingTracking and recording results
  • Allows you to measure and improving business results.  You should track and measure your training results, ensuring you maximize engagement and ROI on training, and then add in business results over time.
Category Management MaintenanceMaintenance programs
  • Contributes to all of these objectives by keeping your program and resources current and accessible – true mastery of skills comes over time with application, not when a course is marked complete!

3.  Complete Cost Benefit Analysis:
Look for the features that will contribute to your overall objectives, and make your choices based on the value that you will achieve over time.   You’ll find very quickly that while price is still an important consideration, it shouldn’t be the basis of your decision.
My first lesson on articulating value came when investigating the dynamics of the ‘loyal consumer’ of a premium laundry product many years ago.  The most loyal consumer was the low income segment, and this conclusion surprised me at first.  When I came to understand that the premium purchase was an investment in ensuring the longevity of their bigger investment, their clothing, the “value equation” became forever etched in my strategic approach.
So today, when I’m challenged to articulate the value that category management training brings to an organization, I go back to my strategic approach to the value equation:
Training Value = Knowledge, Capabilities & Business Wins
Training Value ≠ Cost / Course
If you are considering in investing in category management training now or in the future, you should consider the “value” equation beyond cost, as that will better reflect the overall return on investment that will come both in the short-term and the long-term.  Category Management Knowledge Group offers exceptional value to individuals, teams and organizations in both the retail and consumer packaged goods industries, with an emphasis on meeting customer needs.

Category Management ValueClick here to request a 48-hour pass to CMKG’s eLearning center, to see some of the value in action!


Friday, September 27, 2013

2013 Top 50 US Grocery Channel Small Chains and Independents


TOP 50 SMALL CHAINS & INDEPENDENTS

Here is the listing for SN’s Top 50 Small Chains and Independents. Click on each store for detailed information. Sales numbers are listed as estimates, although SN did attempt to obtain accurate figures by contacting every company on the list. Click here for the story. Click here to purchase a Top 50 pdf that includes sales figures, websites, executives, store counts and more.


Read More: http://supermarketnews.com/2013-top-50-small-chains-and-independents#ixzz2g6Nj453v

Monday, September 16, 2013

Challenges Emerge as Grocery Industry Restructures

NEW YORK — The same forces inspiring a new wave of supermarket consolidation are likely to spark a concurrent groundswell of retail bankruptcies and restructurings.

The latter phenomenon will present opportunities and challenges to lenders, lawyers, strategic investors and others who do business with distressed companies, according to speakers at a panel discussion here Thursday. And understanding the unique challenges facing distressed supermarkets is key to successful restructuring, they said.

“For traditional supermarkets … the market is competitive, it’s saturated, and its been tough for a number of years,” said panelist Richard Pedone, a partner with the law firm Nixon Peabody. “And it’s bringing us to a flashpoint where you’re going to see a lot more distress.

“It’s a mature industry where people are killing each other. And where that happens, there’s bound to be opportunity,” he added.

Much of the stress on traditional supermarkets has come as a result of non-traditional competitors including clubs, mass merchants and specialty stores that have absorbed nearly all of the sales growth in the industry since 2008, said another panelist, Craig Boucher, a director at Deloitte’s corporate restructuring group. Boucher briefly served as Winn-Dixie’s chief financial officer while that chain went through a Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

According to Boucher, pressure from non-traditional competitors is forcing some smaller supermarket retailers to seek additional strength and buying power through strategic mergers. Although there has been more than $22 billion in supermarket mergers in 2013 — the hottest pace of consolidation since 1999 — there is still more capacity not likely to be part of a merger, he said.

“There are 38,000 grocers in the U.S. — not stores — grocers,” he said. This group accounts for more than 58% of the supermarket industry with no single player accounting from more than 1.2% of the total share.
Restructuring a grocery chain presents challenges that tend not to exist when dealing with non-supermarket retailers, particularly on the legal front, said Lee Harrington, a partner in Nixon Peabody’s financial restructuring and bankruptcy practice. These challenges include so-called PACA claims arising under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, which creates a trust for the benefit of suppliers to collect payment on perishable items.

Harrington, who worked on A&P’s bankruptcy, said that case helped to establish a mechanism to deal with such claims, which totaled $3.4 million.

Read More: http://supermarketnews.com/retail-amp-financial/industry-faces-restructuring-challenges-panel#ixzz2f4fmgSYn

Written by  on Spet. 13th, 2013

Monday, September 9, 2013

General Mills plans hundreds of 2014 product launches


 
NEW YORK--General Mills Inc. (GIS) expects food retail prices to be mostly stable over the next year, and will rely on higher sales volume for the bulk of its sales growth over the next year.
"The cost environment is that we're seeing general price stability across all of our categories," General Mills Chairman and Chief Executive Ken Powell said Tuesday in an interview at the New York Stock Exchange.
Mr. Powell spoke ahead of an annual meeting with shareholders and investors, where the company was highlighting some of the more than 200 new products its plans to launch in the first half of fiscal 2014, ranging from a new version of its Yoplait Greek yogurt to protein-rich varieties of Nature Valley cereal.
The onslaught of new products is more than they launched last year, when products like Fiber One protein bars and a 100-calorie version of Greek Yogurt helped make General Mills's sales in its U.S. retail division, by far its largest division with more than $10 billion in annual sales, grow last year. In that same time frame, new products contributed 5 percentage points to the unit's growth, which was up just 1% overall.
The performance of new products will be key to increasing sales volume, something investors still crave out of food makers who have thus far only shown a slow recovery. General Mills in recent quarters has begun to finally show sales volumes increasing, including a 2% rise in the U.S. retail segment in its fiscal fourth quarter.
General Mills sees low-single digit sales growth for its recently begun fiscal year, and most of that increase will come from selling more product. Costs are expected to rise 3%, a level General Mills executives say is manageable.
New products are also being counted on to help revive two of the company's lagging businesses: cereal and yogurt.
The maker of Cheerios cereal lost some market share over the past year, after what it says was lackluster number of new products and less advertising by all the players in the category. In addition to new products, General Mills is also stepping up advertising behind older brands like Lucky Charms and Cheerios.
Yoplait yogurt, which over the past year lost its leading market-share position to Danone SA's (BN.FR) Dannon brand, meanwhile has revamped its Greek-yogurt product to better compete in the fast-growing segment.
Mr. Powell also said the company doesn't see the need to cut prices of any of its products further this year. Last year, General Mills used "selective" price cuts, lowering prices on items like Yoplait's core yogurt cups.
"Our pricing for all of our core and major brands is in the zone that we want it to be," he said.
General Mills shares were recently up 0.5% at $49.52, and have rallied 22.5% year-to-date. Shares have been boosted by investors looking for stable, dividend-paying stocks, and as valuations for food-makers rose in the wake of H.J. Heinz's $23 billion buyout by Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRKA, BRKB) and Brazilian private-equity firm 3G Capital.

Article written by Paul Ziobro for the Wall Street Journial. Original article can be found here. Write to Paul Ziobro at paul.ziobro@dowjones.com

Friday, August 30, 2013

‘Table is set’ for growth at ConAgra Foods


OMAHA — Fiscal 2013 was a “successful and transformational year” for ConAgra Foods, Inc., as the Omaha-based company grew through both acquisition and strong performance in its core businesses, said Gary M. Rodkin, chief executive officer.
After introducing its “Recipe for Growth” roadmap as part of its 2012 annual report, Mr. Rodkin in the 2013 annual report released in late August said the most recent report, titled “The Table is Set,” is an apt descriptor for where ConAgra stands on delivering against five key areas: core/adjacencies, international, private brands, people and citizenship.
“In FY13, we took a big leap forward in delivering on those strategies,” Mr. Rodkin said in a letter to shareholders. “The acquisition of Ralcorp is a transformational move for our company, and a catalyst for our growth. Our Consumer Foods business successfully added the P.F. Chang’s and Bertolli frozen meal businesses to the portfolio, broadening our reach in the frozen aisle.”
Delving deeper into several of the company’s five growth strategies, Mr. Rodkin pointed to private brands as a substantial and sustainable growth opportunity for ConAgra.
“With the acquisition of Ralcorp complete, we’ve increased our annualized net sales of private brand products fourfold, making us the largest private brand food company in North America,” he said. “Having successfully integrated prior acquisitions of private brand nutrition bar, pretzel and pita chip businesses into our existing private brands capabilities, the addition of Ralcorp was a landmark step in transforming our private brands business.”
The first several months of ownership of Ralcorp have opened eyes for ConAgra executives, Mr. Rodkin said.
“Through our new, larger scale, we are better positioned when it comes to product sourcing and supply chain efficiencies,” he noted. “We’ve already begun to realize some of these synergies and expect to continue to identify additional sales-related opportunities as the integration progresses. We expect to achieve $300 million in annual cost savings by the end of FY17.”
Another focus area at ConAgra is “growing the core.” To that end, Mr. Rodkin said the company is leveraging the strengths of its portfolio and accelerating strategies related to innovation and marketing. He cited the integration of the Bertolli and P.F. Chang’s frozen meal businesses as an example of how the strategy is taking shape. The company currently is expanding its facility in Russellville, Ark., where the two brands are made.
“We’re excited to apply our transformational approach to innovation to these great brands, while taking advantage of opportunities to expand brand reach through strategic adjacencies such as desserts,” he said. “We’re applying what we’ve learned through the Marie Callender’s dessert pie business — where we’re driving category growth of 5% annually — to reach new consumers.”
ConAgra also succeeded in its goal of expanding internationally, Mr. Rodkin said. In the fiscal 2013 annual report, he noted that net sales of Act II popcorn increased 10% in the 13 weeks ended March 24, according to data from Information Resources, Inc., a Chicago-based market research firm.
“The brand underwent a package redesign and reformulation to address its value position in U.S. markets and premium position in international markets, applying successful strategies from Mexico throughout Latin America,” he said.
Two other international success stories were ConAgra’s affiliate, Agro Tech Foods, Ltd., in India, and Lamb Weston.
Agro Tech in fiscal 2013 launched peanut butter under the Sun Drop brand and is in the process of building a facility to locally produce the peanut butter in India. Meanwhile, ConAgra is expanding its Boardman, Ore., Lamb Weston facility to meet growing demand, especially from international markets. Mr. Rodkin said Lamb Weston sells to 2,500 customers in more than 100 countries, and in fiscal 2013 Lamb Weston’s international sales increased nearly 9%.
“We’re projecting continued, dynamic international growth in the future,” he said.
Original article posed on Food Business News here (by Eric Schroeder)

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Smucker acquires Enray: Getting into the organic and gluten-free pasta, grains and cookies ball game


ORRVILLE, OHIO — The J.M. Smucker Co. has acquired Enray, Inc., a Livermore, Calif.-based manufacturer and marketer of organic, gluten-free grain products.

Enray’s products include sprouted and non-sprouted grains, pasta and cookies, most of which are sold under the truRoots brand.

“This acquisition strengthens and adds to the breadth of our natural foods business, extending it beyond the leadership position we currently hold in the natural and organic beverages category,” said Richard Smucker, chief executive officer. “The addition of the truRoots brand and its organic quinoa and other ancient grain products provides an on-trend, compelling product platform across the rapidly growing gluten-free market.”

The acquisition includes a manufacturing facility in Livermore, Calif. Enray had net sales of more than $45 million during the last year, but details of the transaction were not released. 

J.M. Smucker Co. is adding the TruRoots brand to its portfolio.
The Orrville-based food products maker and marketer Wednesday announced the acquisition of Livermore, Calif.-based Enray Inc., which makes organic and gluten-free pasta, cookies and grains such as rice and quinoa under the name TruRoots.
Details of the transaction were not disclosed, but it also included a leased manufacturing facility.
Enray had sales of more than $45 million over its latest 12-month period, according to Smucker.
TruRoots adds to Smucker’s natural foods business. The company already owns several natural and organic beverage brands, including Santa Fe Organic, Laura Scudder’s and R.W. Knudsen Family.
Smucker (NYSE:SJM) is a manufacturer and marketer of a wide variety of jams and jellies, coffee, peanut butter and other food product brands, including Smucker’s, Folgers, Jif and Crisco. It reported its first-quarter results Wednesday.

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Best Overall Brands: Crest, Gillette, and Dove; and Kellogg, Heinz, and Kraft



The best overall brands in health and beauty, and food and beverage categories are Crest, Gillette, and Dove; and Kellogg, Heinz, and Kraft, respectively, according to a pair of new Forrester rankings based on online surveys this year of 4,500 adults. The Boston-based market research firm argues that brand health comes from the extent to which it is trusted, remarkable, unmistakable, and essential. If you turn that into an acronym, you get Forrester's TRUE formula for brand equity.


In the survey, from which the rankings are derived, consumers said Dove provides "a consistent experience every time I use the brand," and has "products/services that consistently deliver on their promises." Thanks in part to its campaign about authentic, versus manufactured, beauty the company has gone from a $200 million soap brand in the 1990s to a $4 billion mega-brand today, notes Forrester.

The research firm suggests brands shouldn't expect miracles based on spikes in consideration from a new product, or sudden interest from a new ad campaign. Dove's slow and steady pace is exhibit A: trust over buzz wins, says the consultancy. The firm says P&G's Crest and Gillette also lead in their categories because of this, with the latter leading among men between 25 and 34. The firm says that by contrast, younger, more niche brands like Axe haven't yet built trust, and haven't become "essential" to consumers. The brand, per Forrester, does resonate with consumers 18 to 34.

Dove, meanwhile, does best with women 40 to 49, with consumers overall preferring Dove over all other brands based on the levels of trust consumers have for it. The survey found, for example, that the brand provides "a consistent experience every time I use the brand," and scores well for "having products and services that consistently deliver on their promises."

Thanks to a refocus on athletes, Gatorade did well in the food and beverage survey in terms of consumers' sentiment that the brand helps athletes "to always perform at their peak." Forrester said the PepsiCo unit's marketing strategy around affiliating the brand with athletic performance, plus touting scientific research to back its claims, puts it above Coke on the brand ranking with its core target audience of 20-something men. The firm also says Gatorade's efforts have helped return it to a dominant -- 46% share -- position in the global sports drink sector.
Generally speaking, the study finds that familiar food brands have the highest TRUE ranking and "old-guard" brands are more trusted by upstarts. And -- not surprising -- as trust drops, so does preference. For example, Vitaminwater, whose preference level is under 20%, has the lowest trust score of any brand in the competitive set. Above Vitaminwater is Snapple, which is bested, in terms of preference, by Pepsi, Lipton, Gatorade, Kellogg, Nestle, Kraft, Coke and Heinz.

Article Written by , Yesterday, 2:34 PM for Marketing Daily - original post can be found here.http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/204498/forrester-healthy-brands-are-true.html#axzz2ZFVaGIQj

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Kroger to Buy Harris Teeter for $2.4 Billion


A Kroger-operated market in Del Mar, Calif. Kroger will acquire 212 Harris Teeter stores.
The Kroger Company, seeking to expand in the Southeast and mid-Atlantic regions, said on Tuesday that it would acquire Harris Teeter Supermarkets for $2.4 billion.
Kroger agreed to pay $49.38 a share in cash, about 2 percent above Harris Teeter’s closing price on Monday and 34 percent above the price on Jan. 18, when media reports emerged that Harris Teeter was exploring strategic alternatives.
Harris Teeter has 212 stores in North Carolina, Virginia, South Carolina, Maryland, Tennessee, Delaware, Florida, Georgia and the District of Columbia. The company also operates distribution centers for grocery, frozen and perishable foods in North Carolina. Harris Teeter posted $4.5 billion in revenue for the 2012 fiscal year.   Kroger said it would finance the transaction with debt and assume Harris Teeter’s outstanding debt of about $100 million. Harris Teeter will continue to operate its stores as a subsidiary of Kroger and will continue to be led by Harris Teeter’s senior management team. There are no plans to close stores.
Kroger expects the deal to result in savings of $40 million to $50 million over the next three to four years.
“This is a financially and strategically compelling transaction and a unique opportunity for our shareholders and associates,” David B. Dillon, Kroger’s chairman and chief executive, said in a statement. “Harris Teeter is an exceptional company with a great brand, friendly and talented associates, and attractive store formats in vibrant markets run by a first-class management team.”

Thomas W. Dickson, the chairman and chief executive of Harris Teeter, said, “Harris Teeter has a long track record of creating shareholder value, and this merger is the culmination of those efforts over many years.”

Bank of America Merrill Lynch advised Kroger and Arnold & Porter served as legal adviser. J.P. Morgan Securities advised Harris Teeter, and McGuireWoods was its legal adviser.

Original Article authored by Dealbook for the NYTIMES and can be located here)http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/07/09/kroger-to-buy-harris-teeter-for-2-4-billion/?ref=business

Thursday, May 23, 2013

J.M. Smucker’s Rules For Success

J.M. Smucker’s Rules For Success
(Article authored by Robert Stevenson, Guest Author for Jexet.net)



In an article I wrote a while back called Corporate Culture Counts, I briefly wrote about the J.M. Smucker Company. I believe this company is an excellent role model to follow for teach-ing anyone how to successfully run a business today. Founded in 1897, this company now employs over 4,800 employees and is doing over $4.7 billion in sales. Tim and Richard Smucker are the Co-CEOs for the J.M. Smucker Company and they believe they serve 6 constituents:
“the consumer, the retailer, our employees, our suppliers, our communities, and our shareholders. We believe if we take care of the first five, the sixth will automatically be taken care of.”

They live and work by the creed, You Will Reap What You Sow. Here are their rules for achieving success in business:
•Let the Golden Rule guide every decision.

•Don’t have secret strategies – make sure everyone knows the strategy and knows their role.

•Have a culture that promises people a better tomorrow based on their good work.

•Don’t be content; you’re responsible for making things better.

•Doubt your own infallibility.

•Have faith. Believe in a higher force.

•Don’t do what you know only for material rewards – be called to your life’s work and have a purpose.

•Laugh and have a sense of humor.

In a world where corrupt deception abounds, it is refreshing to have such a prominent company set a great example of just the opposite. But their written words are only a guide to follow; it is your leadership, your example, your culture that will determine your success.

About the author: “Robert Stevenson is a highly sought after, internationally know speaker. He is the author of the best-selling books “How to Soar Like An Eagle in a World Full of Turkeys” and “52 Essential Habits For Success.” Robert is a graduate of the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) and is a former All-American Ath-lete. He started his first business at 24 and has owned several companies. Robert has international sales experience dealing in over 20 countries and his client list reads like a Who’s Who in Business. He has shared the podium with such renowned names as General Colin Powell and Norman Schwarzkopf, Former President George H.W. Bush, Anthony Robbins and Steven Covey. www.robertstevenson.org

Monday, May 20, 2013

Sprouts Seeks Fuel for Growth in IPO in Plan for 1000 Store Expansion

Sprouts Seeks Fuel for Growth in IPO
(Article written by Jon Springer for Supermarketnews.com and can be found here)

The retailer here, which operated 157 stores as of May 1, said it plans to grow its store count by at least 12% annually over the next five years, with the potential to operate as many as 1,200 nationwide. Sprouts posted comparable sales growth of 9.7% in 2012, according to the filing, and has marked positive comps for 23 consecutive quarters.

Sales for 2012, including Sunflower assets added during the year, totaled $2 billion. The company posted $20 million in net earnings for the year.

Spouts, which is controlled by the private investor Apollo Capital Management, did not indicate how much it intended to raise in the IPO, but said it intended to use proceeds to service debt from its recent refinancing and for general corporate purposes.

Sprouts in the filing said its combination of natural and organic foods and low prices in produce gives it broader appeal than "high end" natural and organic retailers. Its strategy is to use low prices in produce to attract and then transition conventional grocery shoppers into more loyal "lifestyle" shoppers.

"The foundation of our value proposition is fresh, high-quality produce which we offer at prices we believe are significantly below those of conventional food retailers and even further below high-end natural and organic food retailers," the company said. "We believe that by combining our scale in and self-distribution of produce, we ensure that our produce meets our high quality standards and can be delivered to customers at market leading prices. In addition, our scale, operating structure and deep industry relationships position us to consistently deliver ‘Healthy Living for Less.’ We believe we attract a broad customer base, including conventional supermarket customers, and appeal to a much wider demographic than other specialty retailers of natural and organic food."

The IPO would follow those of other growth-oriented speciality food chains that have tapped the public markets recently, including Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, The Fresh Market, and Fairway Holdings.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Kraft CEO Tony Vernon Gives The Most Delicious War Rhetoric

Kraft CEO Tony Vernon Gives The Most Delicious War Rhetoric

"On a deeper level, rhetoric also involves cultural specifics. As tribal creatures, we will trust a speaker who seems to be "one of us". This means a speaker must also display shared cultural assumptions, which involves conscious and unconscious allusions, references and cadences. George Bernard Shaw's observation that Britain and America are two countries divided by a common language is acutely relevant here."
          ~ Sam Leith, Moreintelligentlife.com


(Technically Chips Ahoy! is apart of the Nabisco portfolio which is a subsidiary of
 Illinois-based Mondelēz International, Formerly Kraft Foods, but this picture is awesome.)

My personal favorites from Tony Vernon's recent speech:

“Waking up sleeping giants attracts attention, and others want a piece of their success,” Mr. Vernon said. “Here I’m talking about products like Kraft macaroni and cheese, Kraft salad dressing, Oscar Mayer cold cuts, Miracle Whip and Kraft Mayonnaise, where we’ve seen new, aggressive, competitive entries."

"... we will not tolerate incursions into our market share..."

"We will defend and build our key segments, and they do attract some real competitors, especially Mac & Cheese with 80% market share."
 
"Salad dressings, mayonnaise, and Miracle Whip are pitched battles right now. Also Jell-O,"

Read more on the story at FoodNavigator.com.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Where Did Food and Grocery Companies Land on this Year's Fortune 500?

Where Did Food and Grocery Companies Land on this Year's Fortune 500?
(Written on May 6, 2013 by Davide Savenije for Fooddive.com)



The Fortune 500 for 2013, the annual list of U.S. companies with the most revenue, has been announced by Fortune magazine and a whole slew of food companies were on it. Check out who made the list:

1. KROGER
Rank: 23
Revenue: $96.8 billion
Profits: $1.5 billion

2. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND
Rank: 27
Revenue: $89 billion
Profits: $1.22 billion

3. WALGREEN
Rank: 37
Revenue: $71.6 billion
Profits: $2.13 billion

4. PEPSICO
Rank: 43
Revenue: $65.5 billion
Profits: $6.18 billion

5. COCA-COLA
Rank: 57
Revenue: $48 billion
Profits: $9.02 billion

6. SAFEWAY
Rank: 62
Revenue: $44.2 billion
Profits: $597 million

7. SUPERVALU
Rank: 86
Revenue: $36.1 billion
Profits: -1.04 billion

8. MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL
Rank: 88
Revenue: $35 billion
Profits: $3.03 billion

9. TYSON FOODS
Rank: 93
Revenue: $33.3 billion
Profits: $583 million

10. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS
Rank: 108
Revenue: $27.7 billion
Profits: $1.55 billion

11. KRAFT FOODS GROUP
Rank: 151
Revenue: $18.3 billion
Profits: $1.64 billion

12. GENERAL MILLS
Rank: 169
Revenue: $16.7 billion
Profits: $1.57 billion

13. KELLOGG
Rank: 192
Revenue: $14.2 billion
Profits: $961 million

14. LAND O'LAKES
Rank: 194
Revenue: $14.1 billion
Profits: $240 million

15. CONAGRA FOODS
Rank: 209
Revenue: $13.3 billion
Profits: $468 million

16. SMITHFIELD FOODS
Rank: 213
Revenue: $13.1 billion
Profit: $361 million

17. DEAN FOODS
Rank: 217
Revenue: $12.9 billion
Profits: $159 million

18. WHOLE FOODS MARKET
Rank: 232
Revenue: $11.7 billion
Profits: $467 million

19. H.J. HEINZ
Rank: 234
Revenue: $11.6 billion
Profits: $923 million

20. HILLSHIRE BRANDS
Rank: 288
Revenue: $9.3 billion
Profits: $845 million

21. LEUCADIA NATIONAL
Rank: 299
Revenue: $9.3 billion
Profits: $855 million

22. HORMEL FOODS
Rank: 319
Revenue: $8.2 billion
Profits: $500 million

23. CAMPBELL SOUP
Rank: 338
Revenue: $7.7 billion
Profits: $774 million

24. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES
Rank: 339
Revenue: $7.6 billion
Profits: $677 million

25. DOLE FOOD
Rank: 372
Revenue: $6.8 billion
Profits: -$146 million

26. HERSHEY
Rank: 384
Revenue: $6.6 billion
Profits: $661 million

27. INGREDION
Rank: 386
Revenue: $6.5 billion
Profits: $428 million

28. SEABOARD
Rank: 411
Revenue: $6.2 billion
Profits: $282 million

29. DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP
Rank: 427
Revenue: $6 billion
Profits: $629 million

30. J.M. SMUCKER
Rank: 452
Revenue: $5.5 billion
Profits: $460 million